this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
745 points (87.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2987 readers
377 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The Dems rig their primaries, and not only that, they argued publicly in court that they have every right to do so.

[–] DeLacue@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The things is that they do have the right to do so. If they were to simply, unilaterally declare which candidates they're going to put forward that too would be perfectly legal. There is no law mandating primaries. The parties are Independent organisations and how they pick their candidates is entirely up to them. If you were to create a brand new party and pick which candidates you're putting forward by drawing straws that would be perfectly legal too. Both parties just choose to hold primaries because for one thing it picks a candidate more likely to win and secondly it obscures how much democracy has been undermined in the US. The systems have been rotting well before Trump.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

All true. It's an absolutely shit system for 99% of Americans, and it always will be, because this country doesn't exist for the 99% and never has.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If that were true Analilia Mejia wouldn't have beaten Tom Malinowski. She did.

If that were true, Cuomo would've beaten Mamdani. He didn't.

If that were true Janet Mills would be winning her primary. She's not.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yep, we've thwarted them for now, in a few exceptional instances.

But a few examples don't matter in the long run. Look at what happened after Ross Perot. They're already figuring out how to strengthen their hold on our institutions so these few scattered examples aren't repeatable.