this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
743 points (87.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2987 readers
1169 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The solution is breaking Free of the oligarchy and supporting the candidates that represent the working class in government break free of the lesser evil bullshit that does not exist. Break Free of the false dichotomies that the only option is Democrats despite the fact decades show that they are not helping

[–] KenLin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

so some magical non-existent party is your solution?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If Democrats didn't keep suing to get 3rd party candidates off the ballot, didn't restrict ballot access as tightly as they do, we would have existent 3rd party solutions. The very people you support are the ones that are prohibiting choice.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a meaningless word salad. Give concrete steps. Go.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Show me how to do revolution"

Or you could educate yourself? Not that it's a serious question from you anyway, obviously.

I'll give you a first step: grow food and feed your neighbors. Figure it out from there on your own.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ah gotcha. I gotta figure it out for you. We'll get back to me when you have strategy, coalitions, anything. Right now it seems we have a collection of edge lord teenagers on Lemmy wearing che Guevara shirts.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You have to figure it out for you, we're doing alright out where I am lol

At least I get to be a teenager at 30, that's some consolation I suppose?

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean...you keep confirming what I assumed to be true. There is no plan. No plan to build political power. No plan to build coalitions. Nothing. Just posting feel good diatribes on Lemmy from your iPhone. You want me to grow a vegetable garden? That's it? Cool.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Political power starts from the bottom.

I'm on like a 10 year old laptop lol

Yes, I want you to grow a vegetable garden. I also want you to try LSD and magic mushrooms.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. I love these empty platitudes. They feel good on paper, don't they? I too am growing a vegetable garden. Let's jerk each other off while we read some leninist theory. Cool cool. I know that's about as much lefties can get done anyway.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Did you drop acid yet? Usually people who do are either less annoying or at least annoying in a different way, so I'm guessing not.

Also I've never read Lenin or Marx or any theory really (yet), I just worked warehouse and temp and other shit jobs so I got first-hand experience. You're really really bad at this whole "trying to read my character and make pointed comments" thing you're doing. Like one of the worst I've ever seen. You landed zero out of three so far.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are literally 2 parties on the ballots.

Your solution is to vote for a third party that does not exist?... if so, your solution is less than useless

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

From the outside perspective, there is one party on the ballot. They take money from the same super Pacs, from the same Ceos, from the same lobbyists, from the same bankers, for the same end game

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

maybe on your ballot there are only two. but not me.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not USian... do you actually get the possibility of choosing something NOT republican or democrat?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

depending on the jurisdiction, and the race, and a concept called "ballot access", yes.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, so for the vast majority of people, not an option... this has been a productive discussion

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as i said, it depends. most people had 3 to 6 options for president.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as I said, it is clear these are not true options...

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

people really could have voted for any of them. we can even write in candidates. the fact that so many did not is not evidence that those people couldn't have.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They have no solutions, only criticism.

The solution is to get the fuck off the Internet and het involved. Go to caucuses, vote in primaries for progressive candidates like I did. I didn't get selected as a state delegate but at least I was there caucusing for the most progressive candidates available.

This defeatist talk is cowardly.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The talk of cowards is not having the balls to do what's right and could keep capitulating for those that are causing the problems that we're experiencing.

Do what's right? Can you elaborate on what that is?

Leave the country before the madness swallows us all