this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1003 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

47486 readers
1000 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Where can I see who voted for and against? I want to know if I need to change who I vote for next EU election.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Scroll down and select your country: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

It's always the ones you most expect.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Green = "opposing", red = "supporting".... "chat control extension". I guess the greens are against the chat control proposal, though that's hardly clear, and there seem to be more reds than greens so that suggests the chat control proposal was accepted, or is there some other layer to this? Also the stance of a state bears no relation to that of its representatives. Very confusing

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

352 against

248 pro

44 undecided

A simple majority will do

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about a web page linked to by MoffKalast, see comments above

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Well the proposal is to extend the temporary exemption that expires on April 4.
As it is now under this exemption THEY ARE ALREADY doing their dystopian scanning.
Since there is no legal framework to do this they and it's against the current laws they use this exemption until they can force the final law that legalizes it.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "Chat Control" proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos.

it's explained right there above the vote summary

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not the topic of the vote I'm trying to clarify but rather trying to make sense of that web page showing who is voting for what, and how, if at all that is connected to the European Parliament vote. That website suggests overwhelming support for the proposal at both state and representative level, I'm not sure what to make of that.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it seems to be backwards, they voted for an "Extension of the temporary derogation", which I assume means if do you want to take more time to discuss this problem vote yes, or vote no to enact the newly proposed law now. Which is why the greens are paradoxically for the proposal and the EPP is against. Another layer of shenanigans to confuse people I guess.

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It could be, although it also seems that "opposing" representatives are usually of the left/green persuasion and the right wing is mostly "supporting", which is not what I'd expect to see in that case. All I can say for sure is that it's very confusing.

EDIT: thanks for that link 😁

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)

EDIT: apparently EPP voted against not because they want to support privacy but because the proposal was not enough invasive. they were afraid that it would have stopped their Chat control 2.0 proposal.

[–] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For those of us out of the loop, who is Patrick?

[–] kapulsa@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably Patrick Breyer, who often posts about privacy issues in the EU parliament.

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/

i think they mean patrick breyer from the german pirate party

[–] dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Definitely not a Krusty Krab

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What?
I see conservatives+ extreme right pro. Also some fake left

Against greens -real left.

(Not absolute since they vote individually)

But by faction:

pro: EPP,ECR, ID/Patriots

Against: EFA, The Left, Renew Europe, S&D(divided)

Undecided: S&D, Renew Europe

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

EPP and ECR voted against extension, but IIRC the reason is that they wanted stricter controls instead. Most other parties were largely in favour of extending the current chat control mandate.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

True, was confused.
This was the result on the initial proposal, not the vote on extension of the exemption.
So as I understand it, we already have chat control since there is no legal framework (initial proposal didn't pass) and this exemption allows them to spy on us.