this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
319 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

83125 readers
3714 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I hope the real reason is that they're running out of money to try new features. But some of their stated reasons, like their AI age verification sucks, aren't so bad either.

...Actually, OpenAI has a suspicious number of reasons why they can't do adult mode. I think they protest too much.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

nVidia had announced that instead of 100 billion for nothing to OpenAI that they were doing 30 billion for stake, and said they were probably not going to keep giving these 'halo' AI companies money after this.

I also saw a report that banks were starting to get a bit more stingy with money to the same companies.

I think that while there's still plenty of money coming in still, it does seem like the 'take our unlimited cash just because you have AI in your name' phase is wearing out and they actually have to try to convince people now.

Which is a pretty big problem for them, as despite their brand recognition they aren't really seen as the 'leader' in the AI space on any particular front.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think it's about video generation. They shut down Sora because it was burning too much money. Imagine how much a massive amount of porn videos would cost.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This here. The dirty not-at-all-a-secret is that NONE of it is profitable. It is all a money-burning, water-wasting, RAM-market-sucking black hole.

There is no road to profitability unless they somehow convince everyone to pay multiple thousands of dollars per year for subscriptions. At least that's what I keep hearing; evidence otherwise with real references, I'm open to consider.

EDIT: ~~back~~black

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Sure, but I doubt RAM plays a big role in this.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep. I bet the reason they never actually closed the deal with Disney is that Disney discovered that shitty Sora CG cost more than their in house systems.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Or because of that recent ruling that you can't copyright AI generated images. If Disney can't copyright the videos Sora produces, then it's useless to them.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

I think even the text prompts are unprofitable. Sam Altman said so once, even for paid plans. I wonder if they're still in danger of bleeding themselves dry. One can dream.

That was probably what sunk the Disney deal.

Disney can already make shitty CG animation for basically nothing. What Sora did was offer a way of doing it without any real expertise, but Disney already had that. It was probably impossible for Sora to actually produce lower-tier Disney content for less than Disney is already able to do it for.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

I think it's that they are preparing for IPO, which means opening their books and being an attractive investment.

Sora was killed because it haemorrhaged cash for each generation. Investors wouldn't be comfortable with that still running in the books.

This is killed because a respectable investment does sell porn.

Yeah, i think they are already doing it as a pass-through with some other company.