ranzispa

This is all good, but give us the insult now: I just got a Jewish Asiatic mexican lesbian with African origins to deal with right now.

I'm pretty sure that onion did not cook 5 hours. Just cook it 5 hours and the plastic will go away.

Great depiction of peptide based protein inhibition.

Is tobacco advertising allowed in the USA?

Then again, if it is malware you're worrying about I don't really see how that could help. If they're exfiltrating stuff they're likely doing it on port 80 or 22. By blocking other ports you may prevent them from spawning a client for a command centre of a bonnet or something like that, but that would also be often done through port 80 or 22.

But well, if you do want to block everything going outside that you did not specifically allow your approach is correct: deny everything by default and allow just what you need. I'd open as much software as I need and use ps to check all the ports they are using and allow them.

I'm not sure I really follow: what is the purpose of blocking outbound traffic on a system you control? I guess the main point is in case of infection from malware you'd be blocking their traffic. But malware will most probably be using port 80 or 22. Otherwise I guess you could install some software which you wish to use offline and not communicate outside, for which I'd just block that door or execute it in an isolated container or one of those systemd traps.

Feels more like a pain if this is a computer you use. I guess this is doable on a server as more or less you know what will be running there, but every time you install something you'll have to check all ports it needs and go into iptables to edit the config.

Don't be too hopeful, it will probably be the upgrade to Debian 14 in 2030. And the issue will probably be: yes, you need to change the repo and then full-upgrade.

I mean, the only thing I buy online is plane tickets. And I really hate buying plane tickets. At my work I have to go through a travel agency, and I do like sending them an email which is I have to be in this place in the period X with 2/3 days flexibility. I want to get there before hour X and I want to be sleeping near this place. Then they reply with 3/4 options of which I choose one.

If the AI was able to do that and I don't have to check all possible flights and all the fares and which one is cheap and so on... I'm cool with that.

Besides that, I doubt AI will be able to buy pants from homeless people I cross in the streets.

Chemical weapons appear as a much better option than viruses. Enemy is there, drop a nervine agent and everyone is dead. Wait for a while and you're free to advance.

Viruses in much more difficult to operate: infect someone somehow - I guess a bomb or something like that could be used as well. Wait several months so that enemy actually gets infected on large scale, but not too long because most of them won't be dying anyway and soon back to battlefield. In the meantime vaccinate the whole of your invasion army. Start producing massive quantities of vaccines just in case it spreads to your own country somehow and you'll have to treat your own population.

Assuming you were able to create both the virus and the vaccine within the period the war lasted, it may give you some bit of advantage during a period of 1/2 months or something like that. Good enough if you're able to win the war in such period, but if you've got that kind of money to spend I'm sure you've got way more efficient options.

I am from other country. The only ID I am required to carry with me is driving licence while driving. And in most cases it won't be a problem if you do not have it. It is advisable to have ID with you while crossing a border, and it is required when taking a plane.

Besides that, I'm not required to carry any kind of ID with me at all. I am required to tell the police who I am when asked, and I am required to provide them with the ID if they need it. If they need it and I don't have it, I can walk back home and give it to them or they can give me a lift back at home to get it.

Now, if you're a visiting foreigner it is still advisable to have some kind of ID on you. But that's mainly to avoid the hassle of explaining where you left it and having to go get it with the police.

I work in a hospital, on the way to work and on the way back I often stop by picking mushrooms. The situation you described is not unlike my ordinary life.

All children are provided hepatitis B vaccine at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age as a part of the current vaccination program. Half of the participants receive an additional hepatitis B vaccine dose at birth that they would not otherwise have received.

I don't really see the problem with this. The study was approved by Guinea-Bissau ethics committees.

It is true that they do not clearly specify what the objective of the trial is and what specific parameters will be recorded and how they will be analyzed. But I'd imagine they'll do that before starting the trial and have the protocol somewhere around currently getting worked on.

I don't understand what this has to do with Robert F Kennedy or the US vaccination programme.