Well, "obsolete." Unless your average home invader starts employing nanobots in their crimes guns will still be useful, just not against state level threats that can afford nanobots. Of course, those threats already have f-35s or whatever number we're on now so guns are already of limited effect there.
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
21 points (64.4% liked)
Showerthoughts
38755 readers
955 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Maybe, but drones are so much more fun, and millions of kids start volunteering for training to fly them starting when they are less than 10 years old, so there are plenty of experienced drone operators available at any given moment.
The nanobots we have need a light as power source and only work in a strong magnetic field. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ9aXoah5DA
Just try to avoid having a endoscopic lamp inserted into you while you sit inside a MRT and you should be good, no fear needed.
[...] there's just no way to dodge this sort of stuff unless you have the EMP tech [...]
I think that we are closer of advance EMP technology than remote controlled operative war nanobots that supose a non violent threat more than biological weapons (which I find quite violent and inhumane), not to mention that countermeasure evolution seems much easier than (if not as easy as) the effective sophistication of nanobots, just to say a few...
I mean biological warfare already exists so no need to go 21st century with it. I'd imagine that even if the tech existed, it just wouldn't be cost effective.
We already had a sublime propaganda machine, yet here we are with AI anyway...
And cost effective only matters if you actually want to solve problems for people, not if you want to make money by creating something nobody wants and have you and your friends in the military-industrial-political complex get astronomically rich together.
Wait until you hear about viruses or prions. Truly terrifying nanobots. Worst of all, they already exist. Those things are out there right now.
Chemical weapons appear as a much better option than viruses. Enemy is there, drop a nervine agent and everyone is dead. Wait for a while and you're free to advance.
Viruses in much more difficult to operate: infect someone somehow - I guess a bomb or something like that could be used as well. Wait several months so that enemy actually gets infected on large scale, but not too long because most of them won't be dying anyway and soon back to battlefield. In the meantime vaccinate the whole of your invasion army. Start producing massive quantities of vaccines just in case it spreads to your own country somehow and you'll have to treat your own population.
Assuming you were able to create both the virus and the vaccine within the period the war lasted, it may give you some bit of advantage during a period of 1/2 months or something like that. Good enough if you're able to win the war in such period, but if you've got that kind of money to spend I'm sure you've got way more efficient options.
Yep. Bio weapons are terrible in every way. Now that RNA vaccines are in production, making new vaccines just got a whole lot faster.
That reminds me... let me post another shower thought...
Glad I could help!
Prions are absolutely wild. There is no cure, no "vaccine" - not that that would even be possible because they're not viruses, bacteria, or even living things from outside your body. They're just a faulty version of something that already exists in your system and they make your body self-destruct.
There have never been enough concerns to be worth to develop a vaccine for a prion, and current used techniques are those for being efficient for their targets, but as far as I know prions are just proteins and proteins can be (and are) targeted, the whole immunitarie system often relies on those...
Prime horror movie material.
You trust your body. You trust your mind. But what if the enemy... is already inside you?
They’re not viruses. They’re not bacteria. They’re your own proteins... twisted. Hungry.
They hide in the folds of your brain. They wait in the silence of your cells. And when they strike... you won’t even know you’re already lost.
PRIONS
COMING TO AN ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM NEAR YOU
Congratulations. I am now terrified of my own brain.
New fear unlocked.
load more comments
(2 replies)
We live in a terrifying time
Well, the nanobots that you are describing do not exist, so they aren't what is making the time terrifying
That sounds much more complicated than just using a gun. And they even work on people in hazmat suits.
Why would you destroy potentially useful human resources?
Are you insinuating that your nanobots wouldn't kill people?
Well, they're not mine and rather evil mega corps' or PMCs' from MGS, but yeah, that's what I had in mind...
But then they wouldn't even perform the basic function of a gun. How would that make guns obsolete?
Because converting your enemy to further do your bidding is way better than just killing them, of course!
Not always.
It's more like you're making bribery and traditional brainwashing obsolete. But if you just want someone dead, a gun is still the better tool.
no violence needed
How is this entire thing not violence?
unless you have the EMP tech
So you mean like robots with electronics in them? You should read less science fiction. This is beyond bill gates microchip injection nonsense.
Robots with electronics in them and when they bark they shoot electronics at you?
Also how is this different form just gassing the enemy?
When I say, "their bodies are yours," I'm talking about the nanobots being used to mind-control or pacify them, not kill them.
Mind controlling nanomachines? [citation needed]
*insert Neuralink here, 20 years later*
load more comments
(1 replies)
It'll be mosquito sized drone that stings you in the neck and then you die
Or, again, injects nanobots through that stinger, which then take control of your body. Why let a perfectly fine slave body go to waste by dying?
They most probably won't, there is literally zero chance that someone would kill you with nanobots.
probably won’t
zero chance
view more: next ›