Linux

64109 readers

725 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

103

I Spoke To The Developer Of The Systemd Birth Date PR - YouTube (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

236 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some of you need to watch this video, and hang your head in shame.

Dylan Taylor has been receiving constant harassment, including threats to his life and safety, for actions done collectively by SystemD. The article by Sam Bent was explictly mentioned as part of the harassment campaign, and rightfully so.

I don't think enough people realize that this is catastrophically bad. It'll discourage people from becoming open source developers, it'll discourage people from using Linux, and it'll discourage legislators from taking the Linux community seriously.

If you ever wished ill upon another human being for complying with a relatively inconsequential law, you are better off never touching a computer again. The Linux community has collectively gone so far beyond what is acceptable here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drastic133@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You are right that it was a loaded question, and you had a smart answer, but the implication of this "inconsequential" change represented by the current birthdate is of course more invasive identification later.

Otherwise why would they bother, because as it is now it is useless or inconsequential.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 hours ago

Otherwise why would they bother, because as it is now it is useless or inconsequential.

The leading theory is that this is to help companies in California comply with the child online privacy laws.