this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
14 points (88.9% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
2137 readers
14 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes....
The idea of the 'infinite' grid; is that all points are 'equivalent' in the system. Local generation is no more advantageous than remote generation.
This is of course not how reality works. But it isn't too far off, when you consider how efficient the HT system is at transferring energy.
Local generation mainly provides resilience for when there is a natural disaster. This is obviously extremely important; but it is not a justification in and of itself. Also what does 'provide firming' actually mean when we consider the context.
If there is several thousand megawatts of wind planned and economically viable; local storage shouldn't effect that. A MW of power produced in Southland may be consumed locally; or it may be consumed in Auckland; electrically from the point of view of the grid; these are the same place. Power will flow to where it is easiest; we direct the flow using various methods, but it is physical laws that drive the flow.
If we add 1GW of solar in Northland; it will be better than 1GW in Southland, simply because the Northland system will be smaller to get the same output.
If Southland has great wind resource; that is great and it should be developed; the whole country will benefit.