this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
144 points (97.4% liked)
HistoryPhotos
1284 readers
459 users here now
HistoryPhotos is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
- Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.
Related Communities:
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The stance for competition shooting is entirely different than shooting for self defense. You practice shooting for self defense with your torso pointed at the enemy because that's what your body does instinctively when you're in danger. Turning your body 90 degrees when you recognize a threat is a waste of precious milliseconds needed to save your life. There's also the issue of body mechanics. Pointing at the enemy like I said allows you to engage your whole upper body to mitigate recoil in a way that blading your body simply does not. Whether or not they are leaning back may not be readily apparent in the image but you can say with certainty that they are not leaning forward, which again, is necessary to engage the core for recoil mitigation.
I'm not eager to explain my credentials because I find the appeal to authority thing really stupid. I will say though, the military is widely known to have subpar handgun training, evidenced by countless videos online and countless professional trainers complaining about the amount of unlearning necessary to teach modern handgun training to people with military experience.
The weapons don't really look like the high recoil type, though admittedly I'm no expert. I'm going to bet they were doing just fine.
Recoil mitigation is revelant with those revolvers. They appear to be .38 special which does have some kick. Regardless, even with 9mm it's important. These are pistols. You need to land multiple hits to stop a threat. Recoil mitigation determines how quickly you can fire accurately again, which determines how many shots you can land in the precious few seconds you have to defend yourself.