Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Look up The Enlightenment from about 1720 to 1800.
Enlightenment was huge. And it gave us our current scientific methods, got rid of alchemy finally, and of course pushed for saner government. This is from wiki:
Yes, but it would be a stretch to say that "all" were into it. All educated people, perhaps. I doubt a random peasant knew much about it.
If you're looking for something that every single person understands and participates in, you'll be looking for a long long time.
Even the Industrial and Information Ages only took place in developed nations.
It's kinda hard to say that "everyone" is behind a development when a significant portion of humanity still cooks over an open fire and doesn't have indoor plumbing.
The Industrial Age defined what a developed nation is. To say that it only took place in developed nations is a tautology.
The idea of "developed nations" was only started as a way to target new markets for our industrial companies. I.e. growth had slowed to a point that they needed more places to sell our goods to, to make line go up.
And yet, you haven't addressed the larger point. How can you say "everyone" is taking part in a new societal age if a large percentage of humanity is still agrarian and living nomadically?
It's utterly nonsensical.
I wasn't trying to "address the larger point," and I didn't say the thing you're demanding I defend. I was only making the point that developed nations are considered "developed" because they participated in the Industrial Revolution.