this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
90 points (78.1% liked)

Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

496 readers
351 users here now

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, lots, but it doesn't correspond with the social construct of race, ie. A given "black" person could be substantially more genetically similar to a given "white" person than they are to another person who would be considered a "black person." The genotypal groupings of human populations does not comfortably correspond to phenotypal/cultural groupings of human populations.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

ooh, i think genotypal might be what i was thinking of.

Where phenotypal is a mixture of environmental and genetic expression , genotypal would be exclusively the part derived from genetics.

Would genotypal typically include epigenetics as well or only the fixed DNA based parts?

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Close but not quite, genotype is the actual dna, phenotype is the observational characteristics.

But yes, epigenetics would fall under phenotype essentially.