this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
201 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9089 readers
321 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe I phrased it badly but that's the point I was trying to make the Indian resistance movement that Ghandi was the face of (both the sections he directly lead and the movement as a whole) was far more confrontational and active than the image canonised later by imperial powers of the hunger striking saint reaching freedom for India through moral appeals. Just like Mandela, MLK etc. the real movement was sanitised and laundered to curb future protests.

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I misunderstood you. I get your point now. Our government too uses the image of 'non violent' protests by Gandhi to shut down protests here. The words they use went from non-violent protests to peaceful protests to protesting without disrupting public life (like don't strike, don't block roads etc.) What the hell is a protest if it does not disrupt?

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

What the hell is a protest if it does not disrupt?

A parade