this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
33 points (80.0% liked)

Linux

13051 readers
236 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ongoing discussions about age-verification and changes in Free and Open-Source Software and GNU Linux and related OSs made me realize a gross misunderstanding on my part. I think many other users may have the same misunderstanding (seeing many comments using the word "traitors"), and it's important that we become aware of it. We must understand that using or saying “FOSS” or “Linux” does not automatically mean to stand up for human rights, for the community, against corporations, and similar goals and values.

If we read the comments in those age-verification discussions we can see that many developers and possibly also users make statements like “the developers have no obligation towards the community”, “the law is the law, no matter what the community wants”, “we must comply”, and similar. It’s important to realize that many developers work on FOSS not out of consideration for the community, or for human rights, or against corporations. For them it’s just one kind of software development. We may have projects that are FOSS and pro-corporations or pro-surveillance. The "F" in FOSS stands for freedom to modify and distribute the software by/to anyone in the community. It doesn’t stand for “software that promotes / stands up for general human freedom and human rights". But of course there are also developers that work with FOSS because of such values.

So for anyone who, like me, wants to use and promote software as an assertion of, and a stand for, human rights and against corporations, it’s necessary not to stop at “FOSS” or “Linux” but apply more scrutiny and more careful choices. Probably it's always been like this, but the present times require extra awareness.

I wish there was an acronym or other word that made this moral aspect of some FOSS development clear. This would help users to recognize software projects that share their values, and also those FOSS developers who do work for those values. Is there such a term already out there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dig deep enough, read some history? And many on the Far Left contend that you do need to oppose things like Capitalism to oppose Oligarchy.

I'm no Marxist, but his observations on consolidation bear out. From that consolidation, we get oligarchy. From that oligarchy we get corruption and the worst sort of Epstein crimes imaginable. And it all reinforces each other.

What if we all decided together that the people who own Walmart and Amazon are the people who work there, instead of some parasites that sucked out enough wealth to never be able to spend it all for generations?

[–] aReallyCrunchyLeaf@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m no Marxist

the people who own Walmart and Amazon are the people who work there

Friend, may I introduce you to a little something known as "Dictatorship of the Proletariat?"

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, I'm not really into "dictatorship" of any sort. Y'all need to update your language to contemporary English.