this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
117 points (93.3% liked)

Today I Learned

29025 readers
861 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source is Part III § 2 of the US flag code enshrined by 4 U.S.C. § 5.

On the admission of a new State into the Union one star shall be added to the union of the flag; and such addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next succeeding such admission.

This isn't legally binding – you can fly a US flag with five stars representing the CCP and its four governed social classes if you want. But it does represent official federal guidance on the design of the US flag. So if Washington, D.C. were added as a state, you wouldn't see the 51st star appear on federal buildings until the subsequent Independence Day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not constitutional

But for merging? Theoretically legal. Never happening in practice. (For small states, who'd be the likeliest to have a reason to merge, you'd completely fuck your Congressional representation. You'd have to sort out a mountain of laws to merge, throw away, etc. All states wanting to merge and Congress would have to approve. You'd probably spend decades messily unifying infrastructure. I could keep going; there's no realistic circumstance.).

I don't see any provision for it, so I assume – between secession being repeatedly, handily struck down as unconstitutional and merging being so unfathomable – that it's easier to just make something up ad hoc (or go by the addition rule) if any states ever merge.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was thinking a bit ahead. Once the GOP loses the midterms, Trump is probably going to send in the natl guard to several states, proclaiming “the election was stolen.” He will go far beyond the threats of the last lost election. Since the army is, already fully intimidated, dancing to trump’s flute, a few states and a few generals may well unite and decide enough=enough. Then the second civil war will start, for the same reason as the first one (1861-65): secession. And ultimately a couple of stars may well need to be removed.