this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)

art

22987 readers
45 users here now

A community for sharing and discussing art in general.

If you are unsure if a piece of media is on theme for this community, you can make a post asking if it fits. Discussion posts are encouraged, and particularly interesting topics will get pinned periodically.

No links to a store page or advertising. Links to bandcamps, soundclouds, playlists, etc are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus nonsense:

Revenge of the Sith glazing

Glittering Images by Camille Paglia

I stopped reading after this horrendous introduction. I would describe the prose as Redditor adjacent. The author identifies as a civil rights era liberal and atheist, while condemning black art and Piss Christ. There were some pretty pictures in the book tho. I don't know who this author lady is/was but she sucks. 2/10

E: if you look this lady up, as many in the comments have done already, turns out she's a racist, transphobic pedophile. classic anticommunist

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No you see, before davinci painters were dum dums and advances in pigments composition bear no relation to renaissance, they just liked monochrome fills

It’s not like half the 19th century chemistry can be described “how the fuck do we make indigo?” Or ultramarine for painters in 13th, by other means ^or how to crush the venezian cartels^

Or whatever was going on with paintbrushes and canvases, they didn’t fall out of coconut tree as well

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

society (invisible hand of the market) says blue color is impossible to make cheaply, well, good luck to your artistic soul drawing a sky, mate. same for early white pigments ageing (or bright greens, if i remember correctly)