this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15386 readers
543 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

While I think it's bullshit that the city seems to be continually ignoring these citizens concerns, this guy just taking it upon himself to install stop signs and other traffic signals is not ok.

If he wants action he needs more than just a handful of his neighbors' signatures. The city is a political entity, you want action you need to go for the political jugular. Admittedly, a story in a large newspaper or online publication like this is one way to get that sort of attention, but an arrest is not going to help your case. In this age where video surveillance is easy to set up I would have set up a camera at the location and documented every single near miss and if the city ignored that I would have taken it to YouTube and a local news station with a super cut of near misses at that location.

There are multiple ways of going about things like this, flouting the law is not the best.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 53 minutes ago

I disagree. Civil disobedience is a very effective way to get attention to situations that need it.

And arrests can absolutely help your case. I recommend the book "A blueprint for revolution" by Srdja Popovic.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 10 hours ago

The city is a political entity, you want action you need to go for the political jugular.

This is absolutely insane. No, residents should not have to "go for the political jugular" for something as basic as traffic safety improvement.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

He got the 50 signatures required for a study, the study just didn't meet the city's criteria for reevaluation. I couldn't be less interested in the validity of illegalism, root issue is that a community's concern isn't being addressed by their government. A smart rep would seize on this opportunity as an easy win.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Yes, and it's highly debatable as to whether or not they actually did the study. In order to move City councils you need political pressure.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I, for one, appreciate this man engaging in the exact grassroots direct democracy that LA prizes. Sometimes, illustrating exactly where the system fails and where the people prevail is the right approach. He did everything right. And when the government failed, he took it upon himself to do the right thing.

There is a kid that didn't get squished by a truck today. Why would I complain about that?