Linux

64214 readers

757 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Post age-attestation distro migration | Artix vs Void vs endeavorOS vs ??? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 23 hours ago by aReallyCrunchyLeaf@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want to start feeling out future distros for me once the age attestation makes its way into systemd. I am currently using Fedora on two computers, one I use for gaming (all AMD) and one I use for getting work done (thinkpad x13). I am pretty bummed about this because I feel quite settled in with Fedora, but with all the talk of age attestation happening I will be withdrawing my consent from using distros that intend to comply with these laws.

I have targeted three distros, Artix, Void Linux, and endeavorOS. The first two do not use systemd at all and the third has stated they will not implement age attestation methods.

I am thinking endeavorOS might be a good move, I appreciate an out of the box solution. I can and have installed Arch manually several times, but I prefer to spend my time using my computer, not necessarily going into the "rice" rabbit hole. I will probably use a desktop environment like KDE, GNOME, or XFCE.

I guess the point of this post is: anyone who has experience with systemd-free distros like Void or Artix, what are your thoughts using as a general purpose operating system? how is the learning curve coming from systemd? Can someone who is technologically competent but not particularly interested in deep customization (I am a sysadmin, but I just like my shit to work) thrive in this type of environment? I use Fedora because it's a good mix of being generally unassuming but having sensible defaults and being extraordinarily well supported.

Your thoughts are greatly appreciated. Feel free to give me any thoughts you may have on the subject of age attestation or even suggest distros I might not be aware of.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ChrisG@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I've recently spent a lot of time doing bare metal installs of a large number of non-systemd operating systems.

GhostBSD - Its BSD, so its stable and avoids the problems of Linux but supports less hardware especially 3D GPU's.

FreeBSD - as above but more effort to install & configure initially because its server oriented but makes a fine workstation nevertheless.

Alpine - Highly performant Linux oriented to container hosting but can be made into a workstation with effort. Forget using nvidia except in nouveau driver.

Void - highly performant. more packages than Alpine. can be made into a workstation with effort. Forget using anything but newest nvidia GPU's and even then strange unsolvable glitches.

Artix - look this is Arch with a non-systemd init (your choice of 3). Being Arch it inherits the repo's of bleeding edge packages but also inherits the heavy maintenance burden of Arch (if you know, you know). I'm just too bloody busy to baby sit an Arch install with all its nonsense.

Endeavour et al - wait for other OS's to implement work arounds to systemd's cancerous kowtowing to corporate America imposed surveillance laws.

Devuan - a drop in replacement for Debian. Inherits Debian's stability and ease of maintenance but with proven mature implementation of OpenRC init system.

The is the one I use for a calm happy life. To save time you can get a distro called 'Vendefoul Wolf Linux' which is Spanish in origin. Its a spin of Devuan but with a choice of GUI desktops and a GUI Calamares installer (the Devuan text mode TUI installer is fine, but whatever).

My daily driver is Vendefoul Wolf (Spanish for 'vengenance') LxQT desktop. Light, fast simple, stable. tip: download the 'weekly' iso's not the old 2025 ones.

[–] ISO@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

Did you ask an LLM to write a comment full of cliches?