this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
634 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

83264 readers
3710 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
634
Data centers are creating ‘heat islands’ and warming the land around them by up to 16 degrees | CNN (www.cnn.com)
submitted 1 day ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The vast data centers that power artificial intelligence are so energy hungry that they’re heating up their surroundings, according to new research. It’s an alarming finding given the number of data centers is predicted to explode over the next few years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No, you are wrong. Energy is always preserved, computers turn everything that goes into them into heat.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

I would think there'd be some very minor bleeds at a minimum. Like the fan churns the air, and that definitely turns a lot of its energy into heat, but someone of that energy is spent on actual movement, not simply heating air particles. But without more precise figures for that, "well over 90%", or whatever my exact wording was, is true and precise enough to make my point. I could have looked up a more precise figure, but it wouldn't have significantly impacted the very rough math that was only intended to approximate the truth well enough to illustrate the point.