171
submitted 11 months ago by mastermind@lemm.ee to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 62 points 11 months ago

I'm getting the feeling that within the next five years I'm going to be abandoning YouTube and just living without video content going forward.

[-] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago

I'm old enough to remember when none of this stuff existed. I have a threshold Beyond which I simply stop using the service.

I'm actually pretty close to my lifestyle from before 1995. I don't have any cable I have basic internet I don't do any of the Music Services. Video-wise I only have Prime and any free services I can get on Chromecast for TV. I'm getting close to my threshold with prime, as the annual fee is getting real high.

I'm already starting to lose interest in most YouTube channels. It's not so bad here, really. I get to experience reality more.

[-] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I've also been returning somewhat to how I used the internet before modern social media (and it has been nicer).

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Check out PeerTube.

Smart content creators have been setting up websites, Patreons, merchandise shops, and all they need to jump ship when YouTube finally capsizes. The likely/easy/inexpensive alternative for content creators, is PeerTube.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

I seriously wish Patreon would improve the UI because I can see that being where I get my videos. Until then, Nebula is where most of my favorite creators are flocking.

[-] megopie@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Tempted to looking in to self hosting video content, it’s a real storage hog, but if compressed, I imagine some of the mid sized youtube channels could afford to do so, the real shame will be the difficulty for smaller creators to get discovered without a common platform.

[-] upstream@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

The problem isn’t storing it, it’s hosting and delivering content.

YouTube, Netflix, and all the other big streaming platforms have huge amounts of servers around the world delivering content with minimal latency and without saturating the Internet exchanges with gigantic amounts of data traffic.

If we were to do this peer-2-peer people would have to get used to waiting for pages and videos to load again.

[-] megopie@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

So long as the video runs continuously once the page loads, I’m not particularly bothered by latency. Admittedly I’m not everyone, but I think most people care more about the content than the UX. I mean, hell, YouTube has a pretty miserable UX in different ways, not from lack skill on the part of the people who make and maintain it or limitations of technology, but from the poor cooperate incentives and goals that govern it.

[-] upstream@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

It probably wouldn’t. Or you would have to wait a long time.

Try streaming from a site across the world and see how it is today. Then imagine saturating the networks with loads of it.

Would definitely need new infrastructure to cache popular content.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
171 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37443 readers
203 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS