343
Why I dislike snaps (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Screenshot doesn't even show half.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Sigh, I was a sysadmin on my own system from 1999-2008 and on a busy server from 2008-2012... then essentially quit. Now with flatpak and snaps it seems I have no idea what I am doing.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 9 points 1 year ago

Flatpaks aren't very relevant for servers if I am not wrong but Canonical definitely tties to push Snaps for that usecase, I feel like other container technologies like Docker or Podman are a lot more relevant in that context and containerization in general is really nice especially for server use and not that hard to wrap your head around! ;)

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's really what I haven't used that seems significant these days - Docker. I used to use VMs a fair bit including the premade ones from MS for IE testing, which I think (?) are the same concept.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Well not really, Docker dose run another Linux system but on your actual hardware so you don't have the overhead of emulation, it's really cool for a lot of things!

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Huh, okay. I thought it was a quick way to set up a VM - that’s how much I don’t know! I should probably look into it, thanks.

[-] 3v1n0@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Docker requires management and some setup. A server snap just works, it's updated automatically and rolls back when necessary.

It's just a breeze. I use it for nextcloud and I'm safe for years with no maintenance from my side at all.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I won't use it myself because I don't think it's a good idea to give Canonical or any other company that much power and don't think it's centralized nature should be how such package systems work but I don't think it's a bad system at all! The sandboxing has it's hurtles but it's really good and I am a huge fan of proper sandboxing so if it works for you it's certainly a good option!

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Auto updates are not an option for anything mission critical. Every update must be tested in isolation first or you might fuck things up beyond repair.

[-] 3v1n0@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Updates are atomic and if something goes wrong it rolls back automatically

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not everything that goes wrong might be counted as wrong by the developers. Automatic updates is a no-no.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
343 points (93.4% liked)

Linux

47223 readers
815 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS