487

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Sure I can. Every eligible voter who did not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 shares partial blame for Trump winning. Less than people who voted for Trump, but more then none at all.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Personally I would put more blame on the democrats for not fielding a better candidate that could have beaten trump not the people who didn't vote for a shit candidate

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

That’s too many layers of assumptions. I can tell you for a fact that not voting for Hillary lead directly to Trump winning in 2020. We have no idea how another candidate would have done running against him in the general.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Well first yes we do based on Biden winning 2020.

Secondly Voting for trump directly lead to trump winning. At best not voting for Hillary indirectly Lead to trump winning.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

No you cannot compare running against Trump in 2016 to running against him in 2020. I knew how terrible he was in 2016, but a lot of people had to see it to believe it. Even a few weeks can flip an election. Hillary very well could have won without the idiotic weekend announcement before Election Day of meaningless information by the FBI.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I agree that a lot of people had to see trump as president before they knew he was a bad president.

i just disagree with blaming people who didn't vote for trump for trump being elected.

hell I kinda disagree with blaming trump supporters for trumps actions. the people I know that like him are old, uneducated, rural, or deeply Christian, they don't know how to think critically. They don't question the news they get and they only get news from a single source that tells them they are right. they are in a cult, and in a cult the cultists are victims. the leaders are the ones to blame.

Fox News, oan, tucker Carlson, Donal trump are the people to blame for trumps presidency, Jan 6th and project 2025 not the people who voted for him, and certainly not the people who didn't vote for him.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It has nothing to do with being uneducated. Kindness doesn’t require a college degree. Trump has always been a bully, and he ran on being a bully. Someone was ok with that is ok to be blamed imo. I put some blame not all.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's the tricky part of a cult, you get convinced to do things you wouldn't normally do. The trump supporters I know raised their kids to be better, but were just vulnerable enough to be convinced that Trump would bully the bullies and protect the weak, which was a complete lie.

I empathize and hope for them to have the strength to let go of their brain washing and work to fix what has been broken.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That’s fine if they admit they were wrong and voted against him in 2020, great. If not, it’s not my responsibility to reprogram them. They are adults and are responsible for their own actions. If they want to change I welcome it. If you acknowledge the blame and correct it, we’re good.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I get not wanting to put yourself out there to try and help, and it's really hard not to just be a dick to people you disagree with.

but if the question is how do we stop fascism the answer isn't blame them or make them feel guilty about it, it's reaching out and helping them out of it. they are people and people are stupid stubborn afraid and in need of support from other people.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry no. Reaching and out talking to the Nazi’s didn’t work.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It usually doesn't work the first time, ya gotta keep at it. as stone temple pilots say, take time with a wounded hand.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You’ll be in line at whatever the modern day gas chambers are with rhetoric like that. They literally tried overthrowing the government.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

What would you do, to prevent them from gassing me? Put them in their own concentration camps?

I would criminally charge and jail the leaders, trump Roger stone and the heratage foundation, deprogram the followers, just like with any cult. They think they are saving america, just like anyone who says vote D no matter what.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Vote. Don't let them get any more wins. Don't say things that spread apathy among voters. etc.

[-] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Voting is a start, but what about project 2025? What of Roger stone and the Republicans, repeated (and depending on your views of the bush v gore election and the brooks brothers riot, successful) attempts to preempt duly elected presidents from going into office?

It doesn't take a majority to put a dictator in power. That's why converting, calming and understanding republican voters is so important, if they don't show up to the capital then the gop can't use them as an excuse to seize control and bypass the vote.

[-] NotOverSeether@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Everyone who did not vote for Vermin Supreme is also responsible for letting Trump win.

Do you think before you type?

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I don’t count pointless hypotheticals.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
487 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19086 readers
4075 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS