12
Who is this dumb fckn pigeon
Sample comment
It is fascism though, plain and simple, and there's literally nothing at all wrong with that.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15898 readers
323 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
There's no one ideology that you could identify as "Heinlein's politics," they changed drastically over the course of his life and from book to book. Like, the politics of The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, or of Stranger in a Strange Land, much less those of For Us, the Living, bear almost no resemblance to those of Starship Troopers.
Idk, Heinlein's politics pretty much boil down to libertarian crypto-fash with varying degrees of "crypto" and
in the fash, with weird new age stuff getting mixed in towards the end.
Like I'll grant he was more complicated as a person than that (like he learned Russian and vacationed in the USSR, his writing was an outlet for some sort of otherwise untreated mental health issue and he described himself as "becoming physically ill" when he tried to stop writing, etc), but his politics seem like they mostly fit in one incoherent little trough of political slurry.
Toward the end of his career, this is fairly accurate, but the guy was writing for most of the 20th century. For Us, the Living portrays a substantially socialist utopian society. The short story "Coventry" is basically a parable of why libertarianism can never work. Revolt in 2100 is a specifically antifascist revolt, even more so than The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
I Will Fear No Evil is possibly the most egg shit ever written.
On the other hand, The Roads Must Roll glorifies scabs and demonizes striking workers and the Lazarus Long books are about how great eugenics is.
He was a land of contrasts.