242
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Cassidy Hutchinson, a former Trump White House aide, said she had to flee Washington, D.C. for safety after she testified before the Jan. 6 Committee.

“I could not go back to my apartment,” Hutchinson told reporter Tracy Smith in an interview set to air Sunday on “CBS New Sunday Morning.”

Hutchinson, the former assistant to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, said her safety was threatened. Her legal team recommended she leave town.

“I ended up moving down to Atlanta for several months,” she said.

Hutchinson was the first White House member to testify before the committee. On June 28, 2022, Hutchinson told the committee about what she witnessed in the days following the Capitol insurrection.

The former aide told Smith that she almost “darted” from the holding room before testifying.

“I heard the door click open and I turned around and I looked at my attorney and said ‘I can’t do this.’ And I started to walk and he gently pushed my shoulders. And he said, ‘You can do this.’ And then we walked out,” Hutchinson said in the interview.

Hutchinson said she is still a Republican but will not be supporting former President Trump’s White House bid in the 2024 election.

Hutchinson is releasing a book which details her experience in the White House and leading up to testifying at the committee. Her book accuses former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani of groping her backstage during Trump’s Jan. 6 rally.

Hutchinson’s first TV interview will air on CBS and be available for streaming on Sept. 24. Her book, titled “Enough,” is set to publish on Sept. 26.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Radicalized@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

God I hope so, but things are looking dire. The way I see it, if trump wins in 2024, they’ll do everything in their power to never let the democrats win again. This includes gerrymandering and more illegal things like straight up reducing the Democrats abilities to organize and run for office, reducing them to a pet the Repubs keep around so they can point to it and pretend they still have democracy.

They know that everyone under 30 votes Dem. They know their politics are unpopular. This is an existential threat to them and they know it.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If he wins next year he’s going to wage political war on anyone who hasn’t been and refuses to be loyal to him. The blue states in New England, the Midwest, and the West Coast will be his primary targets. California will both resist and retaliate as will New York and many of their neighbors will likely throw their lot in with them. Who knows what form those attacks and defenses will take, but that sounds a lot like a Civil War to me

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Here's what scares the shit out of me.

If either or both of these old fucks dies before the election, there will be horrific chaos.

Imagine what you could end up with.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You’re just spitting facts, Donald Trump is a dangerous fascist authoritarian, and DeSantis is 10000x scarier to me

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Here's what scares me ... what if one of these fuckers dies before the election? Total chaos.

I have a colleague who does epigenetic research. It sounds like these guys will be around for a while, but it's a bit of a crapshoot at their ages

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean depends on how you define chaos it’s not completely unpredictable. Especially as we get closer and closer. If either dropped dead tomorrow it might be pretty wild, but if it’s in July? Not so much

If Trump dies there will for sure be a crazy scramble for who gets the mantle, DeSantis’s stock as been waning but he’d for sure attempt to seize the opportunity and put himself in the drivers seat. And I think at this moment he’d probably succeed. But I don’t think he can unite the GOP electorate nationwide, especially when a solid third of them will likely buy into some half assed assassination conspiracy. Which is scary because they will likely get even more violent in response. Additionally I think the right would splitter pretty hard without him to unite all of their most extreme memebers.

If Biden dies would be less off the wall but maybe harder to predict, Kamala would obviously make her case as incumbent and since she’d be running against Trump I don’t think the DNC would want to sew division. Especially if he kicks it after the campaign really ramps up next year. No time to vet a new nomination in the primaries. This is scary, because while I would obviously vote for her against Trump, I am not fond of her being a fucking DA, I’m sure many others do to and she additionally has the disadvantage of how sexist this country is towards women. And while that irritates the piss out of me it’s the reality, and that disadvantage might cost her an electoral victory against Trump.

So you are right that shit would be scary

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
242 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS