413
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a law requiring K-12 schools to provide gender-neutral bathrooms by July 2026.

The new law, Senate Bill 760, was among a series of laws signed by Newsom Saturday to expand protections for the state’s LGBTQ community.

“California is proud to have some of the most robust laws in the nation when it comes to protecting and supporting our LGBTQ+ community,” Newsom said in a statement.

Under the law, “each school district, county office of education, and charter school” would be required to have at least one gender-neutral bathroom on campus on or before July 1, 2026. The bathroom must be available for use during school hours and during school functions when students are present, the law states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] populustree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 10 months ago

i never really got the whole separated toilets thing anyway, it's a toilet, do your thing and skedaddle

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 45 points 10 months ago

we need to redesign toilet stalls to be more private anyways

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

My biggest reason for wanting separate bathrooms is the propensity for women to squat and spray the seat. I know guys can make a mess too but usually the women's restroom is dirtier than men's. Also women's restroom is more likely to have a line.

But I'm sure building-wise it would be easier to just make one big bathroom so it should probably be that way, long as it's big enough.

[-] maporita@unilem.org 4 points 10 months ago

In areas with lots of people it's also about efficiency. Single stall toilets don't work at a train station. A better option is to have two toilets .. one with urinal and one without. Use whichever one you want.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

For efficiency just add a piss trough. It works great at ballparks and fairgrounds.

[-] stown@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah I love bumping elbows with the guy next to me shaking his pud...

Maybe put a funnel in the floor drain and see who's Alpha enough to stare you in the eyes while pissing in your direction.

[-] SamboT@lemm.ee -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How do you have experience with both men and women's restrooms?

Edit: ow the downvotes

[-] wifepimp4smokes@reddthat.com 19 points 10 months ago

Not OP but the one who cleans sees all.

[-] monk@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I envy a life where you've never had to clean a bathroom.

[-] SamboT@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I have but it was unisex lol

[-] LegionEris@feddit.nl 7 points 10 months ago

Idk about them, but my transition experience was the opposite. Neither is free of animals who were never taught how to operate their bodies in a public space, but my men's room experiences were gross way more often than my women's room experiences are. And now that I share a single toilet bathroom with men at work again, piss in weird places all the time. I understand that there are some places where the women's room is routinely worse, but the average has been the opposite in my experience.

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I used to work in a restaurant so I've had to clean both.

Women are utterly disgusting. Men sometimes pee on the seats but women shit on the walls.

I was stunned the first time. After having it happen once a week or so, you really start to wonder WTF is wrong with women

[-] LegionEris@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Online discussions I've seen on this subject make it sound like it's very location specific when one is routinely worse than the other. I switched public restrooms when I transitioned ~4.5 years ago. My experience has been that both peak at the same level of gross, but men's restrooms were gross more often. A busy enough restroom will inevitably have a user who doesn't know how to manage their body in public, but men's restrooms always seemed just a little more casually dirty. So maybe you should have been wondering who the fuck among your coworkers kept blowing up the women's room x_x Because it's not a gender thing. You just had a serial wall shitter who happened to be a woman.

[-] SamboT@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe woman bring toddlers to the bathroom more often?

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You mean you don't have signs up in your house for your guests to direct them to entirely different bathrooms?

[-] cricket97@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

because females don't like going to the bathroom around men? Not really hard to understand

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Make all toilets more private than thin sheets of wood with an inch wide gap between them and it shouldn't be a problem.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yah, this is not the men making this an issue. I couldn't give a fuck if woman walks into the mens room, I'm here pissing and I'm not going to worry about anyone looking. Gods help you if it went the other way, you'd end up on a list.

[-] jmeel@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure why you're receiving down votes. It's simple as that.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
413 points (96.4% liked)

News

22507 readers
3838 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS