499
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 80 points 11 months ago

Fifth or not, if he gets called to the stand, he goes on it. Then he gets to sit there and make his own decisions, under oath, about how to respond to questions.

In a criminal case, "jurors cannot get information about a defendant's refusal to answer questions or go on the witness stand in their defense." But this is a civil case. "The protections you have in criminal prosecutions when taking the fifth do not apply in a civil case. A jury [or the judge, in this case] is free to make an adverse inference if you plead the fifth in a civil trial."

Call him up.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

And I believe things that come to light as a result can lead to further civil and criminal charges?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago

Oh of course - that would be the case whether it was civil or criminal. New information comes to light that reveals additional crimes or liabilities, AG would need to look at whether those are prosecutable.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

I’m sure that every insurance company, bank, and business that he defrauded using these fraudulent claims is going to want go after him.

[-] thisbenzingring 6 points 11 months ago

There's only one bank that will do business with him as it is....

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I did Nazi that coming

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This trial will have no jurors. It’s just the lawyers, the Trumps, a few related parties, and the judge.

Edit: I tried to find a source, but I’m on mobile, however I read it in one of the previous articles discussing this.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

That doesn't change the nature of the Fifth Amendment in relation to a civil case. When it is a bench trial, the judge is the juror.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

oh, I know. however, the judge is far less likely to be swayed by the Trump’s “Trumpiness” than even your average New York juror given their previous rulings in the case and their complete lack of patience with their lawyers’ arguments thus far.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 11 months ago
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

lol, as I said, I’m on mobile. oops!

fixed now

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
499 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18821 readers
5072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS