414
submitted 10 months ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A New York judge sentenced a woman who pleaded guilty to fatally shoving an 87-year-old Broadway singing coach onto a Manhattan sidewalk to six months more in prison than the eight years that had been previously reached in a plea deal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 21 points 10 months ago

All I have to say is good. Fuck this woman (not literally she doesn't need to get laid). I drink and have been drunk many a times, never in that stupid inebriated state have I EVER thought to murder someone or try and cause them harm. Do dumb shit? Absolutely I'm a drunk fool so you give me a bucket, a empty street and a fuel and lighter I'm likely gonna kick a flaming bucket down the street. But to hurt someone or seek a fight etc? No. I'm still able to keep my morality and decision-making under control over those things.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 18 points 10 months ago

That's uh, pretty specific with the flaming bucket...

[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

That's because that's something I've done when I was 21 😆 we played flaming bucket soccer. It did NOT end in disaster luckily.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 3 points 10 months ago

"Man did you see Mafflez's goalkeeping skills last night?? That dude was on FIRE!!"

[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

That was my buddy Matt actually XD his left Jean leg caught fire, but yea I've done stupid but fun stuff.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You could hurt someone with a flaming bucket though.

[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago

Oh for sure I could. The difference between myself and my friends doing this drunkenly is it was a dead end street with only his house and no vehicle traffic. And while Matt did slightly catch fire, we wouldn't have purposely hurt someone. The lady in the article was said to get increasingly unruly and belligerent. Not how I operate.

Now say we'd caused a house fire or any fire for that matter I'd have fully accepted any punishment for the severity of whatever had happened. Just who I am. I fuck up I own it. Even drunk me knows not to punch someone or harm someone unless I'm in danger.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

So no judgement but for me: drunk fool doing dumb shit ≠ decision making under control. To each there own but shit can spiral out of control rapidly. Be safe out there.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

If you do dumb shit while drunk, you still chose to get drunk. Your fully-aware mind is perfectly capable of grasping that you getting drunk will make you do dumb shit, so imo you're fully responsible for your actions while drunk.

[-] Mafflez@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

I mean I suppose but when I drink now I rarely get to a state I cannot retain reason and think somewhat critical. This was mostly when I was in my 20s. But I would argue being drunk does NOT at all absolve me or anyone else from consequences of actions we made.. even impared. That's why I agree with this woman's sentences. She absolutely deserved what she got.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
414 points (96.0% liked)

News

22488 readers
4372 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS