770
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X
(www.bloomberg.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
770 points (87.6% liked)
Technology
59861 readers
2940 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I just wish the artists would leave, but no other social media allows porn too.
Mastodon totally allows NSFW content. Maybe Threads doesn't, but why trade one deranged billionaire tech overlord for another?
Mastodon has some problems. It's slow, the "instances" concept is confusing, discoverability is poor, and the UI isn't as nice as Threads.
Still worth making the jump for the sake of community governance.
Twitter was destroyed by the governance problem. It proves how we can't ignore the governance structure of the places we invest our time anymore.
But yeah, I'm very disappointed how many people who hate Musk's changes to twitter -- even trans people -- are staying there.
Just search on the #NSFW hashtag, can't miss it.
Many artists have been hedging their bets the last few months, mirroring their content on Mastodon and BlueSky, so that when Twitter/X/Whatever it's called now goes under/is closed/goes subscription only/is locked behind the blockchain, they don't lose their fans, supporters, donators, and commissioners.
Yeah, but that's the thing, most of them have not abandoned Twitter, they have just created accounts elsewhere. For now, at least on the case of nsfw artists, leaving Twitter is unfeasible.
They tend to mirror the content on other sites, so they can further grow their communities there too. Can you explain to me how Twitter remains integral when the content is available elsewhere too?
It's integral to them because the bulk of their audience, including crowdfunders and commissioners and other potential paying customers, remains there. It can be a difference between having a viable artistic career or needing another job. Xitter is in clear decline and worse by the day, but it still outnumbers the alternatives by hundreds of millions of active users.
Then the solution is for people who like art to accept invites and follow them on BlueSky.
Or to use Mastodon.
Hundreds of millions of those active users don't care about art unless Elon's stealing it.
It's definitely better for them to move out but that's a whole process, if they want to try to bring even a fraction of their audience along.
Eh, by that measure there's nowhere to go, because even here I see some people with a wild disregard towards art.
But really, there are people who care or those artists wouldn't ever have had a career to begin with.
Yeah but Bluesky is invite only still.
Do you need an invite?
You got one to give out? I'll take one if so
Sent
If you have an extra invite code, I’d appreciate one too if it’s not too much trouble. Thanks!
Sent
Still many who don't, though, and they're the main reason I still occasionally go back.
Like who?