125
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ScrewdriverFactoryFactoryProvider@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

I’m not on Twitter, so I get my news elsewhere, but most of the actual pictures I see are from here. So is there some kind of bias where only the fascist imagery gets posted here in the the dunk tank? Or do the libs scrolling through Ukrainian posts on Twitter literally see and ignore fascist imagery on every single post? Like, if they see 1000 Ukrainian soldiers, will they see 1000 fascist symbols?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

I struggle to see a clean argument that Putin isn’t fascist. Russia’s economic system looks fascist; the targeting of internal minorities, particularly homosexuals, seems congruent; the regime’s media mouthpieces say things about nearby countries that sound fascist.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

For comparison, Ukraine also has many anti-homosexual and anti-trans laws, while also having a history of attacking ethnic minorities and having doctrinally Nazi military brigades, along with a persistent campaign of whitewashing and lionizing Holocaust collaborators like Bandera, and has a ton of ethnonationalist policy (with its President openly declaring wanting to emulate Israel, an exterminationist ethnostate).

That second group (the non-LGBT stuff) are things that Russia notably does not have. It is literally "just" a modern liberal state with homophobic policy, revanchist rhetoric, and, depending on how you define it, expansionism (here I am thinking of Georgia rather than Ukraine). It is by no means a good country or a moral country, but it is not fascist in the sense that liberal darlings like Navalny are fascist

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It’s interesting that Putin’s fascist mistakes are normal to you, but Navalny’s are not.

[-] ferristriangle@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

And what conclusions does that interest draw you towards?

Do you think that contextualizing something to show how Navalny is exceptional equates to an endorsement of what Navalny is being compared to?

The only reason this comparison is being made is because of how often Navalny is promoted as an alternative to and preferable opposition candidate to Putin in liberal spaces.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (59 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
125 points (99.2% liked)

askchapo

22744 readers
373 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS