this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

Formula 1

11034 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


๐Ÿ“† F1 Calendar
๐Ÿ FIA Documents
๐Ÿ“Š F1 Pace


2026 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 13-15 Mar
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 27-29 Mar
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 10-12 Apr
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 17-19 Apr
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Miami) 01-03 May
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 22-24 May
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco 05-07 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 12-14 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 26-28 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain 03-05 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 17-19 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 24-26 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 21-23 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy (Monza) 04-06 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona-Catalunya 11-13 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 24-26 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 09-11 Oct
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Austin) 23-25 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 30 Oct-01 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 06-08 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Las Vegas) 19-21 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 27-29 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 04-06 Dec

Rules

1. Be respectful.
Treat drivers, teams, and fellow Lemmings with respect. Healthy debate is encouraged, but keep it civil and constructive.

2. No duplicate news.
Please check the feed before posting. Multiple posts from different news companies reporting the exact same thing will be removed to keep the feed clean.

3. Spoilers.
This is a live sports community. We discuss sessions in real-time, so browse at your own risk during race weekends!

4. Make content accessible.
โ€ข Non-English articles: Include a translated summary (e.g., DeepL).
โ€ข Paywalled articles: Provide a brief summary in the comments.

5. Social media.
Post social media updates as screenshots so everyone can view them without needing an account. Always include the original source link.

6. Zero tolerance for spam. Strictly no gambling, crypto, or NFT-related content.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CaptainFlintlockFinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Seems like an odd take to me. The drivers are the ones colouring outside the lines. Why should the track change?

Make the off track penalty harsher. At some point (10, 20, 30seconds?) whatever gain a driver may get from going off will be completely cancelled.

Could also remotely cap the power to the car by 20% for a lap.

[โ€“] florge@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Making the penalty isn't going to do anything when the punishment is handed out laps later when the driver doesn't even know which corner they went off at. The best way to enforce track limits is with a physical barrier, be that kerb, grass or armco. I think Hamilton wasn't getting any track limit violations until they moved the track in and effectively got rid of any physical barrier. When it's just a white line you can't see and you go over my millimetres, there's no way to know you're within limits unless you drastically reduce the amount you push, something only Max could really get away with.

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The best way to enforce track limits is with a physical barrier

Or we can stop acting like we're living in the last century and put technology in place that exists already. Helmets can be fitted with HUDs and sensors can be installed on the cars and at corners which need policing. With processing power that exists in current embedded systems, a virtual representation of track limits to an extremely accurate degree can be projected onto the visor in real time.

[โ€“] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

We've had walls for millennias. Way simpler than AR visors and holographic lines. They work great too, just look at baku and Monaco.

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Weโ€™ve had walls for millennias. Way simpler than AR visors and holographic lines.

Maybe horseback riding is more for you?

Walls mean a track becomes deadly for motorcycle racing. F1 is supposed to be at the forefront of technology anyway and spin-offs of such tech could be used in real cars when driving in misty conditions.

[โ€“] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fair enough, then we don't race on moto gp tracks as we agree it's too dangerous for them. There's plenty of tracks where they don't get out of the lines because it's either slower or your race is done if you go over. Lines and penalties don't work no matter what we argue here. Every single driver will tell you they want a physical limit not a theoretical one. The problem is track design not driver visibility. They go out by centimeters at worse, that's not the kind of thing an AR visor will fix.

[โ€“] florge@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Feel like there would be a lot of push back on that, it sounds too much like a driver aid.

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

it sounds too much like a driver aid.

It's an aid but one that's merely offsetting the reduced field of view.