-3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I see a lot of people saying it was to counter a non existing counteroffensive the media here keeps talking about. According to them, for weeks now, it could 'happen any time'. But now that the dam has broken, the imaginary counterattack will probably not happen anymore!

[-] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Just speculating here:

We know the US is basically ready to give up on Ukraine (Pentagon stating Ukraine can't win back territory and other such analyses that get buried by MSM).

We know Ukraine is on the verge of economic collapse and depend on US/European funding (US has just announced they'll pay Ukrainian government wages).

If this fabled counteroffensive does occur and fails (which it likely will), it's very likely the US will pull back. After all, they've gotten most of what they wanted (blowing up Nordstream, making the Europeans depend on them for gas, privatizing Ukraine, fat profits for corporations have been gained). Furthermore, they can't really deal with all the backlash, and want to pivot for a confrontation with China.

Ukraine is most likely the culprit here, as it gives them an excuse to push back their "counteroffensive" while saving face for themselves and their overlords.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ukraine is most likely the culprit here, as it gives them an excuse to push back their “counteroffensive” while saving face for themselves and their overlords.

While also manufacturing yet another atrocity, which as we can see in the western internet, are super popular among the bootlickers which add to the war fervor in the west by itself.

Also it was a strategic target, it does make things harder for Russia.

Finally, see the below pic from Wapo: UA had the plans for blowing the dam last year, but they "held off". But between the dwindling help from the west, recent Russian bombings of ammo depots and the bloodbath at Bakhmut one thing is increasingly more clear: there is no getting back the lost territories. Which therefore went from cathegory "temporarily occupied" to "theirs" and thus might as well destroy the crucial infrastructure.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
-3 points (0.0% liked)

GenZedong

4239 readers
230 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS