this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1075 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30754 readers
707 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wikipedia was useful for me as a grad student because I could look up a topic and there would be a whole lot of citations I could follow. I never used them as a source, but rather as a curated forum of information.

[–] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia is like our dear friend. It gives us general information, good advice, and direction in life, but never gets too deeply in it. The choice is ours to make.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only problem is that half of them are broken :(

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd be impressed by how good I was at finding PDFs of original articles on random sites. Turns out that when you go to grad school in the third world and don't have access to the journals in the same way as you are accustomed, you learn how to do it for yourself.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This was back in 2010-ish. Don't know if it works the same way now, there are probably better ways to go about it. Not sure if sci-hub existed at that time. Will remember that going forward.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been doing exactly the same thing with LLMs recently.

"Tell me about "
"What are the big problems their industry is trying to solve?"
"Who are their biggest competitors?"
"What's the worst/best thing about them?"

Questions like that often give me a great framework to look up specific questions, find relevant articles and get a handle on the sources that are likely to be useful.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd definitely be careful about made up stuff, but this sounds like an interesting idea.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Very careful. I never use anything from them directly. I just use them to give me a starting point on what to look for.

For example, if the AI tells me that some company is know for their low latency database, I'll look around for primary sources on the latency of the database compared to other vendors. I'll also look for evidence to the contrary.