46
submitted 2 years ago by bizzle@lemmy.world to c/trees@lemmy.world

In my opinion I don't think that's the right solution. I think cannabis is closer to coffee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago

As someone who has ingested a lot of weed, strong disagree. I don't know how anyone who has experienced being high can say they are not impaired. That's a mind blowing statement to me.

I definitely wouldn't say it impairs you in the same way being drunk does, but I also wouldn't say driving high is the same as driving sober. And if you are driving high you really need to cut that shit out. All it takes is one time where your reaction time is slightly decreased and it could be catastrophic.

[-] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

I would say it really depends on person, tolerance, strain, etc. The issue with DUIs for THC intoxication is that it's practically impossible to prove that someone is under the influence definitively like you can with alcohol. Even without a shred of evidence a breathalyzer will tell you if someone is over the legal limit, there is no equivalent with marijuana.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
46 points (88.3% liked)

Trees

6778 readers
10 users here now

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

  1. Be Cool.
  2. I'm not kidding. Be nice to each other.
  3. Avoid low-effort posts

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS