1759
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

Your cries for help are meaningless if you can't tell the difference smh

[-] quaddo@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

They could call it a "fnorplgleek" for all I care.

Until they figure out how to prevent any and all fnorplgleeks from having the ability to injure, main, or kill another human being when the fnorplgleek operator wishes to harm you unlawfully, they can expend 100% of their thinkbox time figuring out how to do so. Like, pin their wetware CPU to working out a solution. Interconnect them Borg style.

If the response is "well no, not like that" then we recognize that it's a compromise that continues to put victims in front of said fnorplgleek operators.

brb getting a "Down with fnorplgleeks" t-shirt made

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

are "fnorplgleeks" pencils? because what you described sounds like a problem with pencils.

[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

So you wouldn't care if the legislation was written to ban anything that has the potential to kill?

Guns, cars, knives, bleach, rope all could fall into that category. See how words have specific definitions and actually matter quite a bit? Especially when the law is concerned. Why do you think there's different categories of homicide? Do you think manslaughter and 1st degree murder should carry the same penalty?

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl -1 points 10 months ago

Only one is made to kill. All others have other uses

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So large jacked up trucks have a use? Butterfly knives and swords have practical uses? What about cars with more than 200 hp? Not like you can do 120mph anywhere legally, so why have them? Or alcohol, more people are killed 10 fold via drunk drivers than all rifles combined... sounds like alcohol should go back to prohibition era and the gov. poisons it.

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

I take it you're for walkable cities then?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Absolutely and mass transit. Trains should have been worked heavily into long distance travel in our country. Even though I'm a petrolhead, I still don't understand why we neutered our mass transit and civilian walkable infrastructure...might have helped with our obesity epidemic.

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Good to hear we can agree on that

load more comments (60 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1759 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

5185 readers
3347 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS