498
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

Morale and trust within the Walt Disney World government has deteriorated since allies of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis took it over earlier this year, according to many employees who have departed in recent months saying the governing district has been politicized and cronyism now permeates the organization.

More than 40 out of about 370 employees have left the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District since it was taken over in February, raising concerns that decades of institutional knowledge is departing with them, along with a reputation for a well-run government.

“When I first joined the District, I found an organization that strived to be the very best at serving our community, sought the very best employees and valued those employees above all else,” a former facilities manager with three years of experience said in an employee exit survey last week. “I find myself leaving a completely different District. A District that prioritizes politics above all else and will gladly sacrifice its employees, its community and its work if there’s an opportunity to score political points.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 110 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As I see it, this whole debacle is as much proof as I or anyone should need that DeSantis is unfit to be president.
When the state's largest employer, one who had supported him in the past on many issues, dared oppose him on one single issue that had taken the national stage (where they could do nothing other than oppose or be seen as discriminatory), he decided to punish them. Not in any way that was even a little bit effective, but in a punitive and immature and ineffective way that has replaced an effective good government agency with a politicized useless committee.
His actions say to me that he is neither a good representative of Florida's people, nor a wise leader, nor even an effective politician. He is a child who had a temper tantrum when he didn't get his way, so he tried to smash his favorite toy and didn't even break it.
We can do better. We have to do better than that, for the good of the nation.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Luckily (or unluckily) national Republican voters overwhelmingly prefer tRump

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 10 points 8 months ago

Unlucky. I think Biden is a better candidate than either of them, but I think the American people deserve to have two decent choices to pick from.
I have no particular love for the DNC either or many of the Democratic candidates we've seen, but at least they manage to more often than not put forward someone who would at least make a semi-functional administrator who tries to execute some sort of plan.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

And Disney didn't even strongly oppose DeSantis. It was a wishy-washy sort of opposition and DeSantis responded to it with a "I'm going to destroy Disney!"

Yeah, right. People can have their quarrels with how Disney operates, but you can't deny that Disney is a powerhouse. You do NOT want to get on their legal team's bad side unless your case is VERY good.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

Exactly. They are a huge company, they win when they fight, and they are also his state's biggest employer. Why pick a fight with them at all? It's stupid. There was no reason for it.

Hell, if DeSantis had two brain cells to rub together, he'd have met privately with Disney and said this is important to me, so oppose it publicly all you want just don't put any serious action into it, and we can pretend to fight but still be friends. That's a win-win, Disney gets the credit for being woke, he gets the credit for being anti-gay, they each play their roles. I'm pretty sure Disney would have gone for that. Shady as fuck of course, but far more effective for everybody than the childish tantrum he went off with.

Whoever sits in the oval office should be clever enough to see possibilities like that, not emotional to have a tantrum when he doesn't get his way.

[-] twisted28@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If the christo-fascists were able to take over, this country would crash overnight. Whether they want to admit it or not, secular educated scientists, engineers etc create the wealth of this country. You cannot believe in fairy tales and be a world leader.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It's the same story over and over. Any government that prioritizes loyalty over competency will find themselves ruling over a disaster. It doesn't even really matter what the pet ideas are.

It is just better for everyone to hire and support the people who are most capable even if you disagree with them on every single issue.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

Without a doubt. But I think a lot of the extreme social conservatives, both politician and populace, are like a dog chasing a truck- they wouldn't know what to do with it if they actually got what they are going after. Many of those positions are just based on a general sense of fear and dissatisfaction, the religious element is happy to play into that and a lot of conservative politicians are happy to play into both to get votes. It's a shitty strategy and it's bad for the country and making it mainstream is one of the worst things Karl Rove did to this country. It's like McCain legitimizing Sarah Palin, only worse.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
498 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18114 readers
3649 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS