If a man has intercourse with a man as with a woman, both commit an abomination. They must be put to death.

How in the fuck does it take a significant amount of mistranslation or ignorance to read that as "gay is bad"? You can speculate all you want about temporal context, but there is not a scholar alive that actually knows what the actual context was. Sure, we can assume contextual clues, but that is about it.

I hate to say this, but your analysis about "male" vs "man" and the silly confusion about "as with a woman" is just odd. I understand breaking down the meaning of a sentence into ultra-fine components, but damn...

"If someone with a dick tries to fuck another person with a dick like a woman (put it in the butt), it bad. You die." -- Today, in our context, that is what it means.

Books like the bible are written like an extended Nostradamus prophecy so they can be interpreted in any way that "scholars" see fit. Especially in this day and age, some things have to be taken literally.