127
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

CEOs of crashed tech upstart Bitwise accused of swindling $100M from investors - Duo paid themselves $600K salaries as the cupboard was emptying::Duo paid themselves $600K salaries as the cupboard was emptying

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I worked there AMA.

I still dont have access to my 401k.

[-] Usul_00_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

What do you want to share using the anonymity of this platform?

I don't know enough to even ask a good question.

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thats the neat trick, never assume anonymity. Def in a case like this one. I treat people with respect even here.

But I guess if I had to share, im still really pissed that our 401ks are still locked and I cant access it from John Handcock. Plus some people got 2 paychecks taken instead of just the last one. We had to cancel our old bank account because bitwise post Jake/Irma tried to come after past checks from multiple people. If my bank didnt protect me, direct deposit apparently will happily allow them to take past checks back. And BW did not talk to us this entire time after we were furloughed. After 3 weeks of being furloughed, we were still technically employed and had ex-bitwisers try to tell us not to talk to the media, to trust the system. I am still angry about how it all went down.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

..what do people actually do in places like this?

Having never worked in an office at all, I wonder what happens in those that have no obvious way of doing anything really

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

We would get a large amount of client projects, create an app that solves their problem, deploy it on their infrastructure. Rinse and repeat. I was specifically on the software development and later devops side. My job was a huge amount more profitable than the rest of the org.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

How much did you pay yourself?

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I wasnt part of the leadership, but I was a software developer for over 10+ years. I made 6 figures, but that isn't unheard of in this industry.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Dumbest thing you saw/ heard while working there?

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

There was a DJ over there for weeks on end. Like every day, DJ was out in the parking lot. It was surreal coming into the job and wondering why the were paying for a DJ to come to a mostly empty parking lot/building.

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you worked at Entertainment 720

[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nero playing music as Rome was burning kinda thing.

That’s surreal for sure.

Sounds like something right out of Mike Judge’s Silicon Valley series.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There was a DJ over there for weeks on end. Like every day, DJ was out in the parking lot. It was surreal coming into the job and wondering why the were paying for a DJ to come to a mostly empty parking lot/building.

I mean, wut? But like ok. But also wut.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Boardroom:

  • people will like coming into the office if we create a fun atmosphere
  • like a party!
  • we can't have an actual party
  • ok, how about a DJ

HR, legal, and so on: they can go in the parking lot.

Weeks later an admin is told to book a DJ, I don't care what it costs but they have to work in the parking lot.

DJ has to be set up in the parking lot but will only do it if they can be there all day otherwise too much set up and take down.

Ok, if they have to be here I want them playing all the time. Otherwise, we are wasting money.

Contract shows up with "daily, renewed every month unless 30 days written notice."

And so on.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Absolute legend

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Was it obvious they were indulging while they could or did it seem like they were trying to make it work? Just curious.

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its a little of both. Like most orgs there were some who did their job and did it well. The org was in existence for a little over 10 years. Most of that time, they didnt have venture capital. They were a very small org that suddenly got big and decided to expand outside their local community. There were parts that were very profitable, just not the building and how top heavy it got at the end. Both CEOs would take month long vacations and leave us to do....whatever it was they did. The family/friends thing was definitely a problem.

The unlimited vacation was a kind of red flag to me. Most orgs who do that really just want you working 24/7 and not take any real time off. Also 401k took 3 years to vest but no partial vesting period. It was all or nothing.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
127 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
4390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS