1026
Yes, also Teslas (media.mastodon.scot)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Source for that? If there is an increase of that at all it would be surprising. "Massively" definitely is just make belief.

You don't need to make up shit to support your point

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I have already responded to multiple people who asked for sources, which you apparently didn't bother to check. One source I cite mentions a 20-50% increase in tire wear. A simple internet search will bring up literally dozens of articles.

It's always amazing how the laziest and nastiest people on the internet, like yourself, are always the most ignorant. You don't need to start shit to support your point.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The who comes with claiming facts bears the burden of proofing not the one who asks for proof.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I provided sources multiple times. Jesus, does anyone read on this thing?

[-] gayhitler420@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your service 🫡

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are angry about people not finding it despite wanting to prove your point not me. Add the source into OP instead of bitching at people who were not part of your conversation with others. Or don't be rude about it.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Here is Kwik Fit, the largest tyre repair / refit retailer in the UK saying the complete opposite. They say that conventional tyres wear faster. The downside of EV tyres is they're still more expensive. It's not hard to find similar points made by others who have the knowledge to make the comparison.

So yeah but no.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You’ve completely misunderstood. EV tires are designed to wear slower because EVs eat through tires faster. If you put more expensive wear resistant tires on a lighter conventional car, it would obviously wear even more slowly.

Your link is not journalism. It doesn’t even cite its sources. It’s literally a blog entry by a tire company encouraging you to buy tires. The multiple experts cited in the actual news articles I posted say increased tire wear from EVs is a huge environmental problem.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, so you you're saying EV tyres are designed to wear slower, and yet they eat through tyres faster? Did that even make sense in your head? And if this design is a thing (slower wearing I mean) then why don't ICE vehicles also do it?

And no EV tyres are not more expensive because of whatever you imagine but because of simple market forces - EVs are less common therefore, tyres cost more.

And yeah my link is not journalism. It's pointing to actual companies that deal with breakdowns and replace tyres. The sort of people most people would implicitly trust to know what they're talking about.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t know if you’re willfully misreading me. I am saying that EV tires only wear slower when they do because they have to be specifically designed to withstand the extra friction. But EVs wear equivalent tires faster than non-EVs because EVs are heavier. If you don’t understand this, I’m not sure how to explain it to you.

Imagine someone saying “Chairs for obese people last longer than those for normal weight people.” That may be, but only because they are designed that way. You can’t change the laws of physics. EVs are heavier. As the many experts across the actual journalistic sources I cited say, that means more friction and more wear.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1026 points (88.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9826 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS