475
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 11 months ago

I see why psychology tests are considered quackery so much. Being anti-social, or just not interested in other people's life is not being autistic.

This test is repeatedly asking just two questions:

  1. Do you like numbers, the same way Hollywood likes to paint autistic people.
  2. Do you like talking to other people?
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 29 points 11 months ago

A test like that can only ever be a first indication. If you score high on this, it doesn't mean you're autistic. It just means you might want to talk to a mental health professional.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 13 points 11 months ago

Sadly humans always want to boil things down to simple metrics (or maybe we just like numbers... wait a minute!) and people can't be bothered to do the hard part after getting the number. The classic example is IQ tests, which just measure how good you are at that particular quiz (despite certain people obsessing over them like the number is your IRL intelligence stat).

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I didn’t take this test, but another similar 50 question autism test, but I felt the same way. It reminds me of alot of the personality quizzes they give for the different business personality trends out there. Questions where there can be some nuance involved and I can answer the question either way depending on how I frame it, but the answers only allow for one answer or the other. I could literally flip a coin to pick the answer and not be wrong, but somehow one answer will make me more autistic than the other?

[-] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

It's a combination of answers that are used to give a score, not just this answer to one question = more autistic.

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Numbers? Prefers a nice quiet night in? Certified autistic?! /s

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Criticism of psychology tests aside (which is totally valid), do also note that this one is based on the work of Simon Baron-Cohen, whose theories on autism have been proven wrong one after another and miseducated a generation of psychologists.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 11 months ago

Someone didn't like their result and responded by being super autistic about it.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
475 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

4252 readers
1310 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS