381
Billionaires are lining up to eagerly fund Trump’s anti-democratic agenda
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
381 points (97.0% liked)
politics
18821 readers
4820 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Of course they are - they're psychopaths.
They're each and all people who, in a sane society, would be institutionalized in order to protect others from the harm they inevitably do as a consequence of their complete lack of principles, morals, empathy and remorse. But instead they're allowed to run free, and this is what we get.
They've crunched the numbers on fascism and it turns out that a slave workforce you can execute for not hitting KPIs is great for businesses.
Psychopaths? Try Sociopaths.
Por que no los dos?
Because one knows better than and all about the other who just hasn't done enough true research. Mostly because it really don't care.
Taylor Swift as well?
She's pretty much the one exception. She's the only billionaire that legitimately earned it without fucking over hundreds of minimum wage employees. The people who work her tours get comprehensive health insurance, and she pays the truckers $100k. She also kept a music store in I think Nashville alive during the pandemic.
She's become a global pop culture phenomenon akin to the Beatles, or at least close to them. It makes sense she's made so much and it's been actually moral.
I'm not a fan of hers, but everything I've heard about her lately makes me think she's a good person.
Several months ago I got back into a Taylor Swift kick by listening to Midnights, and it's pretty much just stuck around. I read some interviews where she's incredibly personable and eloquent, like stopping mid thought because she saw her cute cat lmao.
There's one that was done over the pandemic that I'm thinking of in particular, where she talks more about her politics and coming to realize that she can't stay politely quiet. She used to have large 4th of July parties, but stopped having them sometime after 2016 and I inferred it was because she hated what was going on with Trump.
Anyway, I highly recommend her. Her more recent works are a lot more cutting and introspective, and there's a definite feminist undertone in how she'll talk about gender norms and dating and the public impressions she has to give. I'm a fan of it.
I'm old. If it wasn't recorded past 1998 or so, I generally am not interested.