485
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago

What consequences do you see? I don't see anything difficult to overcome. What big picture am I not seeing that you're talking about?

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's just what you said.

When there isn't enough people to support the people above them problems start.

Making sure pensions still function properly, having enough health care providers, property values might plummet which in turn impacts retirement for those who have part of their savings in their house (e.g downsizing no longer provides enough funds)

Economic output will drop short of advancements in robots and AI which means there will be less money to support existing infrastructure that was built for all these people. What happens if Japan can no longer fund and maintain their bullet trains due to reduced ridership? They'd start with reduced trains, but that means less money so they get reduced further and further as the population drops. You've gone from a once highly connected area to a poorly connected area and that has its own consequences.

Japan is propping up their problem with immigration, but if the trend happens globally, that isn't an actual viable solution. Somewhere some country will be in a deficit, people get convinced go to wherever the better place is hastening that places decline.

It'll be a lot of things like that which will cause turmoil and disruption, but it's not some end of civilization problem.

We're experiencing a similar problem due to the baby boomers in terms of Healthcare right now. There's so many of them compared to the younger generations that its taking a toll on things and it's going to continue to take a toll and we don't have enough younger doctors to nurses to deal with that.

People are upset, people are angry.

But we'll go on. Its not the end.

[-] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

How long can we keep making future generations larger to support what our/past generations have made?

Humans have covered something like 75% of the earth.

At this point it is more like burning the house down to keep warm.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I have never said we should.

Just because there will be consequences doesn't make it the wrong decision.

There's no consequence free option here.

[-] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

?

Humans have amassed incredible knowledge and prosperity. It's just not used to help people. Change that. What consequences would there be if the "money" on earth was used to help the citizens?

Someone rich getting less money?

We can lower the population and continue to do more and more.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Look dude, you asked, I answered.

Feel free to disagree with me, but this isn't going to be anymore productive, so I wish you a good day and we'll leave it at that.

[-] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Ok. Disagreement is not the death of discussion. Not being willing to explore ideas together is.

Have a nice day too :)

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
485 points (78.8% liked)

News

22831 readers
4583 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS