1039
submitted 1 year ago by spicytuna62@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vale@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

ISO 8601, while great, has too many formats. May I introduce RFC 3339 instead?

https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That is what I love so much about standards: there are so many to choose from.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

YES! I wish more people knew about RFC 3339. While I'm all for ISO 1601, it's a bit too loose in its requirements at times, and people often end up surprised that it's just not the format they picked...

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huh, I've never noticed how much bloat was in ISO 8601. I think when most people refer to it, we're specifically referring to the date (optionally with time) format that is shared with RFC 3339, namely 2023-11-22T20:00:18-05:00 (etc). And perhaps some fuzziness for what separates date and time.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
1039 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1267 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS