525
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 9 months ago

Easier to bear, maybe, but not great. You're likely making some pretty big trade offs. Like, Wisconsin is probably cheaper but it might be way more hostile to you if you're gay or black or otherwise considered an outgroup by the right.

And even if you're otherwise an in group, what're the music, food, and art, scenes like? If all you want to do is work and then sit at home on your couch then I guess one place is as good as another. Though this might be getting into an urban/not-urban divide more than left/right.

And furthermore, even if your "cost of living" is lower in the extreme short term, if you're in a right wing hellscape then you have to pay one way or another for the state being gutted. There's a non-fiction book titled "A libertarian walks into a bear" that talks a lot about how there were two neighboring towns, but one had gone hard right with its policies. The other had not. Turns out the libertarian one sucked. Like, they didn't have a working fire department.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

That town was in New Hampshire, tho I can't recall the name from memory.

They voted out their garbage collection service. Civic overreach or some bullshit. Then the bears came, and got accustomed to being around people. And started breaking into homes. People were attacked. I think there was at least one casualty.

Libertarianism is great for the individual, but anti-thetical to the needs of the group.

I don't know why it's so hard for some people to acknowledge that their own personal choices and beliefs might not make the best policy. Government and law, do not need to mirror your internal dialogue. That is some serious center of the universe shit right there. They'd do well to ponder on the notion of sonder.

[-] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Was this oart of their Free State Project?

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I believe so, yea

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Like, Wisconsin is probably cheaper but it might be way more hostile to you if you’re gay or black or otherwise considered an outgroup by the right.

Worth noting that Wisconsin is a blue-voting state, generally, that has a heavily gerrymandered legislature.

Most of Wisconsin is absolutely nothing like the deep south kind of red state.

And even if you’re otherwise an in group, what’re the music, food, and art, scenes like?

This is, as you surmise, almost entirely an urban/rural thing.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Most of Wisconsin is absolutely nothing like the deep south kind of red state.

The parts of deep south red states where people actually live are absolutely nothing like the deep south kind of red state either.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Ditto. Spent the summer in Madison, WI, earlier this year. Anyone who tried to say that it represents the effects of conservatism is a fool.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 9 months ago

I don't know why I picked Wisconsin. Possibly because I vaguely remembered Scott Walker being a huge asshole

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
525 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18821 readers
5072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS