this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
326 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
81797 readers
4351 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't see a graph here or source, do you know where it's from? This is giving about 25%.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2023/08/06/global-energy-trends-insights-from-the-2023-statistical-review-of-world-energy/
Edit: here's the original paper if people want to dig through it for the data. I have a feeling the headline above is just the capacity rather than the actual generation.
https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Dec/2022-Year-in-Review-Climate-driven-Global-Renewable-Energy-Potential-Resources-and-Energy-Demand
The source in the article claims 27.8% so who knows...
But in general they are talking about electricity, not energy. Maybe the 40% comes from best of situations when it's windy where it needs to be and sunny where it needs to be.
So, did they mix up 14 with 40?
Idk. They might be playing tricks with installed capacity vs the actual energy coming from them, since solar and wind only produce at peak capacity sometimes.
Biomass is also pretty much the worst "renewable" energy source. Consume a buch of water, use land that could be used for food, rising the cost of basics from the people that can't afford to pay more.
And I wonder what the efficiency is compared to something like solar, growing a tree for years just to burn it. I'm guessing it's pretty abysmal.
https://blog.ecoflow.com/us/biomass-energy-vs-solar-energy/