439

Time magazine: "we don't know how yet, but we're gonna find a way to link the rise of fascism and avocado toast"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 121 points 9 months ago

The article is largely good quality but what even is this:

“We couldn’t destroy the Taliban, but office work destroyed the Taliban,” said one Tiktoker, reviewing articles and quotes from the report.

It doesn't even name the person. Just cherry picked some random quip from social media and pasted it into the body.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

I've been hating this since Twitter became a thing. I used to read BBC news articles for (seemingly) good quality reporting, and then they started quoting random twitter users. Like, who gives a fuck?

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hell, there are even news articles only quoting Tweets.

And TV shows only re-streaming viral YT videos. I imagine these people just watch YT the whole day and call it work.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Living the dream, if you ask me. Just don't mix it with serious news. "New political coalition formed! Twitter user rear_beads commented: 'lol'"

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One can view a show about humorous viral YouTube videos to be this generation's America Funniest Home Videos.

Edit: Fix grammar

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

It always seemed strange to me as well. Who is this person, and why should I value their opinion?

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Even worse when a "news" article is just embedding a bunch of Tweets from random people and calling it news.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Which the BBC has done. Awful.

[-] BadlyDrawnRhino@aussie.zone 29 points 9 months ago

Editor: The article is great! All we need now is a quote from social media and we can publish.

Journalist: We haven't been able to find anything suitable, everyone thinks this story is satire.

Editor: Then just post one yourself and then quote that! But don't reference your name, that'll be a dead giveaway.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 15 points 9 months ago

Hard to cite a GPT reference.

[-] kambusha@feddit.ch 8 points 9 months ago

For me at least, "said" has a link to https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTR7mbL8g/

That link only takes me to the front page, but perhaps if someone has a tiktok account that goes to a video (a tik? Tok? Whatever it's called).

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
439 points (97.4% liked)

Not The Onion

11807 readers
288 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS