1573

Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago

ITT: lots of people wondering why Apple won and Google lost, but not reading the article, which explains the difference of the cases.

[-] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago

ITC: Someone not understanding the difference between not understanding and not agreeing.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

Yeah, fuck that. I definitely don't agree with the ruling. iOS is far more restrictive than Android, because at least Android provides the ability to easily install alternatives (F-droid app store is an awesome alternative for many types of apps and it's all free). Sure, Android dominates the market globally, but in the US--nd many other countries-- Apple has the majority of marketshare. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ios-vs-android-market-share-135251641.html

It's just bullshit to me that Apple gets a free pass for clearly being anti-competitive. I'm glad this trial struck down Google's app store monopoly, but all phone OS's should be forbidden from doing it.

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Totally agree with your idea, but so you know Apple has lost another legal fight. Europe condemnes it for monopoly of not only App Store, but also Safari and other services. About a month ago.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The browser monopoly really is a stupid thing, what even is the point of installing any other browser if they have to be reskins of safari?

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

True, thread is full of both types

[-] inverted_deflector@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah and honestly Im fine with courts opening up the platforms more to make at ths point, but the issue is that apple got the win. People cite incentives and back doors dealings on googles end, but apple doesnt need to they just control everything by default no questions asked.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No it doesn't, it just says that the case was different and that it wasn't in front of a jury, it doesn't give the details of the difference. You have to go read the entire article from a few years ago

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1573 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59757 readers
2298 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS