415
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 212 points 7 months ago

He was directly involved with putting together a team to create a false certificate that said he won the 2020 presidential election.

Saved you a click.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Nothing will come of it.

Saved you another click

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 30 points 7 months ago

Nothing except 90+ felony indictments? This dude was never charged with a crime before and this year he got hit with a ton of bricks. People like you would be watching the Nixon resignation saying "he got away with everything".

Do you not understand the gravity of these charges? He's almost guaranteed to be guilty of something, there's so many options. Once he loses the election he'll probably plead to whatever just to get house arrest and end the trials.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 24 points 7 months ago

People like you would be watching the Nixon resignation saying “he got away with everything”.

I mean... yeah? You think his resignation and pardon WASN'T him getting away with everything?

I'm as hopeful as the next guy that the supreme court won't just rule that nothing bad happened on Jan 6th and that Trump is allowed to be prosecuted, but 3 years on, it seems pretty reasonable to doubt it until it's done.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Another thing you haven't mentioned is that Nixon had destroyed McGovern in the 72 election. He won every state but MA!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_United_States_presidential_election

It was insane how far he fell. Watergate proved all his opponents right. And yes, his party turned on him. Half of Republican voters still liked him after his resignation but he literally couldn't get another job anywhere.

I recommend going to the Nixon presidential library. They really try to whitewash the events but it literally stops listing things he did after Watergate. Other presidents didn't even hang out with him.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Oh, boo hoo, he didn't have any friends and had to be well fed and lonesome in a mansion

He should have fucking hung, for prolonging the Vietnam war by five years and hundreds of thousands of bodies if for nothing else

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Lol. Hanging people is for us regular folks, not people responsible for the death and suffering of millions.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I can't possibly disagree more. I don't think you understand how restrictive an actual prison is. The man got to live out his days eating good food, going where he wanted, and doing what he wanted. We should all be so lucky to be able to do that at the cost of merely getting some dirty looks here and there.

Given the war and the oil embargo and everything else that was going on at the time

I don't see how pardoning Nixon helped solve any of that or how they make the pardon any less of a travesty.

Ford gained nothing by the pardon

You know, other than the part where he only got to be president in the first place by making an agreement with Nixon that if he resigned, he'd get a pardon. He got to bail out his buddy and set an example for the rest of his Republican pals that breaking the law is fine, we'll cover for you from the very top levels of government! No matter what the general public might have thought of it, the people within the party saw it as a huge service to their political machine.

Nixon got to live out his days comfortable, happy, and carefree. "He did not even have a state funeral." Give me a break. By this logic, Trump doesn't really need to be prosecuted! He already lost one election, and if he loses the next, he won't have what's REALLY important to him, and isn't that punishment enough?

Of course not. Heinous crimes were committed against the integrity of our country's ability to have democratic elections, and actual, real, legal conquences MUST follow, or the next asshole will comfortably push things even harder. It's thanks in part to Nixon's pardon that the rest of the republicans today are so happy to join hands around their lies about the election being stolen and the Jan 6 rioters being on a tour. They'd never have gotten here so easily without the precedent they have of covering for each other no matter what, no matter how serious, and no matter how high the office.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And Nixon getting away with everything, is also why we are where we are now too.

If the judges don’t fuck up the timeline and he loses, we’re probably ok for 4 more years (maybe longer if the trials scare off future fascist wannabes), but we need better voting rights, Supreme Court oversight and smarter voters before we can relax and not worry as much.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 7 months ago

Nixon's pardon was bullshit, but being forced to resign the presidency is not nothing either in the sense that he certainly did face real consequences. I'm with you that he should have faced greater consequences, but it's simply not the case that he got away with it either. Getting away with everything would mean that he got to finish his term and retire as a respected former president. He didn't.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lol Nixon did get away with everything though? And the precedent is what has allowed Trump to trample on our laws.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Our laws for the highest offices are strongly worded recommendations, not absolutes. They're going after trump's businesses (which he's lost) and him raping people (which he also lost). It doesn't help that the r's are backing him as much as they can.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 7 months ago

No he didn't. Getting away with everything would have meant finishing his second term and retiring as a respected former president. That didn't happen. You can't say that he didn't face consequences.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

"Consequences"

[-] figjam@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

His followers don't care. The people that would vote for him don't care

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id -2 points 7 months ago

And your point is? That doesn't change the fact that there will still be consequences.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 7 months ago

Only if he doesn't win

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You're assuming both that he doesn't win, and given the stakes involved, we can assume unheard of levels of cheating, corruption, and voting fraud, and you're assuming that scotus doesn't drag this out beyond the election.

If he wins and he hasn't been found guilty at that point, then every investigation will be killed on day 1

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The problem is the people that support him think it was all in the game to win and it's okay. They don't take into consideration that bypassing the law now leaves it open for democracy to crumble more. Anything to win now.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
415 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18114 readers
4473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS