206
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by trucy@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

aka non consented circumcision is a human rights violations rule

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Let’s compare this to tail-docking for dogs. There are plenty of legitimate medical reasons that a vet might dock a tail for, including the fact it can be basically impossible to heal a severe injury on one. But if you get your dogs tail docked just for the looks, that’s a shitty thing to do. That’s why where I live, it’s illegal to do it just for aesthetics.

Now, if you’re suggesting that the vast majority of circumcisions aren’t aesthetic, and are in fact a necessary preventative medical procedure. Well, firstly, we survived as a species for hundreds of thousands of years before we started doing it just fine. And secondly, you could just as easily make the argument that removing the testes is needed to prevent future cases of testicular cancer.

Oh wait, doctors do literally say and do this to Intersex babies, with literally no medical evidence to back up their claims. Then try to force a child that was born with external genitalia to grow up as a “girl” after cutting it off.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
206 points (100.0% liked)

196

16032 readers
2626 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS