Bloodlines 2 is coming out sometime. It was in development hell for a while, but it's a new team working on it now and they released something about it recently. It may actually come out eventually.

I'll second that the fan patch for VtM:B is pretty much essential for enjoying it. FNV had its bugs, but it was at least polished into a solid experience before release. VtM:B...wasn't, unfortunately, but the patch gets it there.

The patch is so important I'm pretty sure it's bundled into the GoG version of the game. It's essentially required at this point.

Fallout New Vegas

Even so, I'd rather play a forward-port of Fallout: New Vegas to a newer engine with updated graphics, but I doubt that it'll happen. Retexturing might be doable with AI upscaling or something like that, but I can't think of an inexpensive way to remodel everything. If they're going to do the kind of asset work that I suspect would be required, they'd probably be better-off just doing Fallout 5.

There's the Tale of Two Wastelands mod that put Fallout 3's content into Fallout: New Vegas, but it could just use the content directly, as the two were pretty contemporaneous.

Starfield's engine runs vastly more smoothly for me than even Fallout 76's, does a better job of streaming content into memory.

Also, I liked Fallout: New Vegas -- one could change the world in many interesting and interacting ways, it had great DLC, I liked the New Old West setting, finding unique items felt really neat. But it had a number of warts, a number related to the engine, and I feel that sometimes people look at it with the gilding of nostalgia:

• The game tended to load and save more-and-more slowly over the course of a game. Maybe with a present-day PC on solid-state storage, it'd be okay, but it got absolutely horrendous, especially on consoles.

• It also, in my experience, tended to get less-stable over the course of a game.

• Falling through terrain was an issue.

• Enemy AI was pretty bad. I mean, it was par for the course for the time, but Starfield's human enemies have gotten more-interesting behavior.

• It wasn't uncommon that I'd manage to break one quest or another on a given playthrough.

• Some people really like the "skill point" system in Fallout: New Vegas and earlier, and dislike the shift to just doing perks in Fallout 4, to the point that there have been mods to forward-port the skill system forward. I don't. One thing I liked about the Fallout series was that the SPECIAL points were significant enough that you could feel each point make a difference; this was a shift from the Dungeons & Dragons convention, where a single stat point often didn't make much change. The skill points, however, broke with that, and a given level up didn't make a really noticeable change.

• The perks weren't really balanced; some are clearly better than others. This isn't to specifically criticize Fallout: New Vegas: that's been true for the whole series. But it's not on par with, say, a traditional roguelike, where there's a very long, iterative development cycle where there are tweaks and rebalancing.

• Some of the compromises that had to be made to get performance reasonable are really visible, like the walls around New Vegas, or the limited number of characters running around.

• The view distance and weapon ranges were limited to the point that it was always kind of noticeable.

• There was a lot of polygons clipping through each other. Not the end of the world, but it did impact immersion for me.