900
submitted 11 months ago by flyingsheep@lemmyhub.com to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DreamerofDays@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago

Is the ad revenue on mass transit actually high enough to support its operation?(ignoring even maintenance or expansion, or the replacement of unrepairable vehicles)

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

It's not, and I don't even need to go look it up.

Operating a subway is expensive. Maintenance, new lines, new trains, you name it, it costs shitloads

[-] Aurelius@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It's so expensive that the NYC subway used to be multiple private railroad companies but the business just wasn't feasible (at a reasonable price) when the market had a downturn - which is why the city eventually took it over.

This is why the track geographies are so odd in NYC

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Operating a subway is expensive only when you don’t compare it to operating a city on cars shrugs

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes exactly this. Car infrastructure is the most expensive transportation infrastructure per capita possible. It’s why the US spends tons of public money on transportation and has just crumbling highways to show for it.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Might also be because of how massive the US is with relatively big distances between big cities

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Most commutes are not between major cities, they are within metro regions, so the size of the US doesn’t explain the terrible infrastructure. Besides, for decades now, most of Europe has no political impediments to travel, same as the US. People can commute from Berlin to Madrid as if it were one country. Density matters, but not the size of the country.

As for density, there are many US regions that are of similar density and distance apart as European cities, such as DC-NY-Boston, or Portland-Seattle-Vancouver, SF-LA, etc.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It varies. Usually fares are just there to ration use of the mass transit, providing less than a third of its cost (ignoring capital)

Also: why would you ration transit? You want as many people as possible to use it

No one's so cheap they cycle instead. Those who cycle do so for health. We could free up there roads for the die hard drivers

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

For bus systems at least the amount fares cover is typically on the order of 5% give or take in the US. The fact that bus fares exist at this point in the US has got everything to do with emotions, narratives and a political stance against providing a social safety net and nothing to do with cold hard economics.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The fares themselves usually account for a tiny portion of the overall revenue. For example, in 2021 the MTA had $7.8 Billion in revenue. And they are fighting for $100k of lost fares

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't care. I just hate ads.

this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
900 points (97.1% liked)

News

23659 readers
3538 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS