587
submitted 7 months ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.

The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Unless im mistaken every US soldier not only has the ability but the duty to refuse unlawful orders. 'Just following orders' is not acceptable in reducing any amount of personal fault iirc.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You're correct, but Nukes get reminded about it constantly during training, cause of the reactor that we were expected to know everything about, and the officers don't.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Makes sense, highly specialized skills and labor like that typically sometimes get lost on those who are fit to just manage them and not do it themselves.

[-] Carlo@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

We got lots of Law of War stuff in the infantry as well. People that don't know any better sometimes assume that the military is just a bunch of cops.

[-] Case@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 months ago

This may stem from the fact that police forces are running around with, essentially, military hardware.

There is also a lack of oversight when employing this hardware.

Hell, a cop could unload a magazine at a child holding a stuffed toy, and just say he was scared, and get a month or longer off paid while the department "investigates" itself, and finds no wrong doing.

Police frequently go to the wrong house, and go in guns blazing on innocent sleeping people.

These are militaristic actions performed by a group of people who hire, in part, by the LACK of intelligence in their staff.

Yes, being too smart can disqualify you from police work.

So yes, they get conflated. Have a problem with that? Good, so do I.

Fuck it, require special training to carry a firearm on duty.

And that training shouldn't include learned paranoia, like current training does.

The UK, as a middle ground for training requirements requires 2250 hours of training. Aren't they known for carrying the frightfully lethal whistle? You know, the same basic kind that gym teachers and children's sports coaches use?

US police require 672 hours. 3.35 (rounded) times LESS training than the UK police.

Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/police-training-requirements-by-country

[-] Carlo@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the cops in the US are god-awful, no arguments here. Besides the acquisition of surplus military gear, the lack of adequate training, and the chronic failure of oversight and accountability at all levels of government, they've got this toxic warrior-cop culture that encourages them to act like violent thugs.

I'm (very)cautiously optimistic about the military not supporting a fascist coup. But the cops are chock full o'brownshirts. It's like "Oops, all Brownshirts!" Which is like, the worst fucking cereal.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
587 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS